When I started exploring systems programming beyond my web development comfort zone, two languages kept appearing in every “what should I learn next” thread: Rust and Go.
Diving into these lower-level languages has been illuminating, frustrating, and ultimately rewarding. Here’s my honest assessment after spending considerable time with both.
The Learning Curve: Steep Hills vs. Gentle Slopes
Go feels like it was designed to be learned in a weekend. The syntax is minimal, there are few ways to do the same thing, and the standard library is comprehensive yet approachable. I was productive within days, writing usable code that didn’t make me cringe when I revisited it weeks later.
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
messages := make(chan string)
go func() { messages <- "Hello from a goroutine!" }()
msg := <-messages
fmt.Println(msg)
}
Rust, meanwhile, demands your respect and attention. The ownership model and borrow checker concepts were unlike anything I’d encountered before. The first few weeks felt like repeatedly running into a wall until my brain rewired itself.
use std::thread;
use std::sync::mpsc;
fn main() {
let (tx, rx) = mpsc::channel();
thread::spawn(move || {
tx.send("Hello from a thread!").unwrap();
});
let msg = rx.recv().unwrap();
println!("{}", msg);
}
Performance: Trading Blows
Both languages deliver excellent performance compared to higher-level languages, but they make different trade-offs.
Go prioritizes compilation speed and simplicity. The garbage collector means you don’t worry about memory management, but it introduces some unpredictability during execution. For most web services and tools, Go’s performance is more than adequate, and the development speed benefit is substantial.
Rust eliminates entire classes of bugs through its compiler. No garbage collector means predictable performance and lower memory usage, which matters tremendously in certain domains. However, fighting the borrow checker can slow development considerably until you internalize its patterns.
Ecosystem Maturity
Go’s ecosystem feels business-ready and stable. The language changes conservatively, libraries are generally mature, and finding solutions to common problems rarely requires experimental dependencies. Docker, Kubernetes, and many other cloud-native tools are written in Go, which speaks to its industrial strength.
Rust’s ecosystem is innovative but still evolving rapidly. While foundational libraries are solid, you’ll sometimes find yourself choosing between multiple competing approaches or libraries that are still finding their footing. That said, Rust’s package manager Cargo is a joy to use compared to Go modules (which have improved but still feel clunky).
My Personal Verdict
After months with both languages, I find myself reaching for Go when:
- Building web services or APIs
- Creating CLI tools that need quick startup time
- Working on projects where multiple teammates need to contribute
- Prototyping systems that may evolve rapidly
I choose Rust when:
- Performance is critical (especially predictable performance)
- Memory usage must be minimized
- I want compiler guarantees against concurrency bugs
- Building systems that must be exceptionally reliable
- I want to challenge myself
Which Should You Learn?
Note: IT DEPENDS ON YOU AND WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ACHIEVE!
If you’re coming from a web development background like me:
Start with Go if:
- You want practical results quickly
- You’re building networked services or tools
- You value simplicity and readability
- You prefer convention over configuration
Start with Rust if:
- You enjoy learning language theory and new paradigms
- You’re building performance-critical applications
- You don’t mind a steeper learning curve for long-term benefits
- You want to understand memory management at a deeper level
The truth is that learning either language will make you a better programmer. Go taught me to value simplicity and the power of composition. Rust forced me to think about resource management and ownership in ways that improved my code even in garbage-collected languages. Also, I use rust when I want to be challenged.
What about you? Have you tried either language, and if so, what was your experience? If you’re considering learning one, which aspects are most important for your use case?
Leave a Reply